Wednesday, December 15, 2010

Learning Theory and Educational Technology

8845 Module 1 Assignment

What are your beliefs about how people learn best?

I believe people learn best through feedback, reflection, and opportunities to improve.  Too many fail to follow up a learning experience by offering these chances.  Teachers themselves often don’t feel the time to look back and consider alternatives and possibilities.  Choice should be a norm in education rather than the one for all approach.  Giving options offers an avenue for creativity and engagement while learning and exploring content.  Which would you prefer; lecture and worksheet practice of verb conjugations, developing a poem incorporating the verbs in various ways, creating a pneumonic memory rap to share verb conjugations, gaining approval for an imagined innovative way to express verb conjugation?  Any of these could integrate technology tools as well as offer independence, collaboration, inspiration, and connected learning.  Through the act of creating with content, individuals remember the learning as an experience.  Some say teachers are the worst students as they tend to disregard all their own rules and expectations in behavior that are insisted upon of the learners entrusted to them.  I say learning for any individual should be presented in small doses with time to collaborate.  This peer sharing provides validation which serves as feedback, insights to extend thinking and reflection, as well as a desire to improve upon the original small dose of learning.  All without droning on about information hoping the minds of your audience are open and receiving.  The pulse of knowledge gained can be determined through instant assessment means such as student response systems, board races, mind mapping, etc.  This same choice for students should be modeled through teaching.  Vary the dissemination of content methods.  Multimedia resources are endless.  Rather than being the only source of information, showcase the world as your resource.  Skype an expert, email those involved in the subject matter, offer students an option of discovery for sharing, read a story together that can lead to learning tangents, find an audience interested in sharing learning and commenting on building knowledge, pull in community guests, invite variety, etc.  Design learning instead of dictating content.  (Check out this blog post on Educating the Whole Child)

Here is an artistic creation on John Dewey's Democracy and Education.  What feedback do you think Dewey would have for this resource?


(Campbellkid25, 2009)

What is the purpose of learning theory in educational technology?

Learning theory provides a foundation to guide best practice in integrating curriculum.  Through evolution we can build upon prior knowledge to imagine the needs for adaptation necessary to today’s learners.  Siemens (2006) pointed out that there are many ways to define knowledge; however, searching for a single definition has the opposite effect when it comes to developing an interconnected knowledge base.  How can the idea of an interconnected knowledge base be explained if content is shared separated?  Driscoll’s (2005) definition of a learning theory as persistent change as a result of experience offers connective opportunities of a knowledge base.  Behavioral theorists determine learning through observation and measurable results. 

A combination of learning theories should demand innovative ways to create engaging activities for learning experiences.  Educational technology has made communication, collaboration, and connectivity easier, obvious, and measurable.  Available technology tools offer endless opportunities to evolve and adapt networking knowledge gained in artistic ways creating tangents for enhanced exploration and even more discovery sharing.  Four theorists utilized metaphors to explain this all inclusive educational opportunity we are sitting on the edge of today.  John Seely Brown’s description of educators as master artists, Clarence Fisher’s view of educators as network administrators, Curtis Bonk saw educators as concierges, and  George Siemens pictured educators as curators (Siemens, 2006).  All these metaphors have to do with learners constructing knowledge. Each metaphor can have appropriate applications in today’s classrooms. Students can be learning the same basic concepts but following different avenues. Helping students see connections, should determine the role of the educator as facilitator. The inclusion of each metaphor can lead to an exemplary experience of teaching and learning.

References

Campbellkid25 (October 24, 2009). A conversation with John Dewey. YouTube. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQAtzmaGBeE&feature=related

Driscoll, M. P. (2005). Psychology of learning for instruction (3rd ed.). Boston: Pearson Education, Inc

Siemens, G. (2006). Knowing knowledge. Retrieved from http://www.Lulu.com

Siemens, G. (2008, January 27). Learning and knowing in networks: Changing roles for educators and designers. Paper presented to ITFORUM. Retrieved from http://it.coe.uga.edu/itforum/Paper105/Siemens.pdf

3 comments:

  1. Hi Laurie...

    I really like your statements about choice in the learning process. Having the ability (as learners) to make choices about the process can definitely help an individual take ownership in their own learning. In many ways, I think that this perspective aligns with some of the basic tenets of Siemens (2010) notion of connectivism. Learning occurs when students create connections among the knowledge and skills that they acquire (check out his "TED talk" about this at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4BH-uLO6ovI).

    What are your thoughts, though, about the way our current public education system is set up? Many students are not necessarily making the best choices (for whatever reason) about their own learning. When this happens, educators are placed in the precarious position of almost forcing the students to make these choices in order to meet the demands set by legislation and other social pressures of school systems.

    Again, I agree whole-heartedly with the things that you are saying. How do we bring the ideas that you are advocating to true fruition in a system that is functioning the most effectively?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Mike,

    We need to remove walls and start working together as educators. Curriculum should be combined, not separated by grades, levels, subjects. In reviewing content, integration beyond technology should be considered. Studying Earth Structures and Changes in Science should tie in with the study of landforms, and regions in Social Studies. Educators would have more time in each day if efficiency and streamlining were built into the daily schedule. Instead educators are pressed for time to deliver each content area and students are shuffled around each day for set periods of time in each subject. No connecting, no combining, no time, no room for reflective improvement, just absorption and regurgitation.

    Even as agents of social change we are working independently building upon the research of each other over time. Research needs feedback, reflection, and then improvement, not an endpoint. I don't think anything has a solution, just positive progressive ideas to implement for change to start to occur.

    Thanks,
    ~Laurie Korte

    ReplyDelete
  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete